Showing posts with label sexuality. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sexuality. Show all posts

Saturday, 21 October 2017

ADULT ROM-COM EG1: Four Weddings And A Funeral

WHAT I ENDED UP APPLYING

  • The protagonist being and getting out of bed 
  • Added more narrative enigma rather than having them being in the first shot already

POSSIBLE POINTS OF INFLUENCE:
  • The protagonist getting out of bed after realising they're late


Four Weddings 
And A Funeral
Mike Newell, 1994
BBFC 15 rating, MPPA R rating
Opening length:

LEAD ACTORS: Hugh Grant
                                 Andie McDowell
GENRE: Romantic comedy (adult)

PRODUCTION C0s: Working Title
                                         Channel 4 Films
                                         PolyGram
DISTRIBUTOR: Universal Pictures

BUDGET: $4.5m = £2.8m
BOX OFFICE: N/A (UK), $52.7m (US), $245.7m (worldwide)
CRITICAL KUDOS:
ROTTEN TOMATOES:  Critics 95%, Audience 74%        IMDb: 8.0/10

From wiki: 
The film was very well received with critics, currently holding a 95% "Certified Fresh" approval on reviews aggregator Rotten Tomatoes, with the site's consensus stating, "While frothy to a fault, Four Weddings and a Funeral features irresistibly breezy humor, and winsome performances from Hugh Grant and Andie MacDowell."[6] Film critic Roger Ebert gave the film three-and-a-half stars out of four, calling it "delightful and sly", and directed with "light-hearted enchantment" by Newell. He praised Grant's performance, describing it as a kind of "endearing awkwardness".[7]The film had its detractors. Writing for the Chicago Reader, Jonathan Rosenbaum called the film "generic" and "standard issue", stating that the audience shouldn't "expect to remember it ten minutes later".[8] Time magazine writer Richard Corliss was less scathing, but agreed that it was forgettable, saying that people would "forget all about [the movie] by the time they leave the multiplex," even joking at the end of his review that he had forgotten the film's name.[9] The character of Carrie was voted one of the most annoying film characters of all time in a British online poll.[10]
TRAILER:


IDENTS:
Polygram Filmed Entertainment being the most superior here.




TITLES:
Inter-Titles, one on black and one on a cake
Polygram Filmed  Entertainment and Channel Four are the distributors of the film. Working Title is the production company. White serif font on black background. A flower-like emblem. "invite you to" is breaking the convention of neutral writing, and signifies the comedic and absurd nature of the film. The emblem signifies romance. The  of a serious background can be seen as the serious, romantic element of the narrative.
Followed by titles on live action.

THE OPENING SHOT:
...

NARRATIVE, EXPOSITION:
...

MISE-EN-SCENE:
...

EDITING:
...

GENRE SIGNIFIERS:
...

REPRESENTATION:
GENDER: ...

ETHNICITY: ...

SEXUALITY: ...

AGE: ....

CLASS/STATUS: ...

ABILITY/DISABILITY: ....

REGIONAL IDENTITY: ...

NORMATIVE OR COUNTER-HEGEMONIC?
...

SOUNDTRACK:
....

TRANSITION TO MAIN FILM:
....




Saturday, 14 October 2017

First 5 Shots #2 - Bridget Jones's Baby

WHAT I ENDED UP APPLYING

  • I

POSSIBLE POINTS OF INFLUENCE

  • The

TITLE

Director, 2009

PRODUCTION COMPANIES: BBC Films, 
                                                 UK Film Council,
                                                 Aramid Entertainment
DISTRIBUTOR: Universal (US)
                          Optimum Releasing (UK)
GENRE: Political satire 
               (subgenre of comedy)
LEAD ACTORS: Peter Capaldi
                            Tom Hollander
                            Chris Addison
                            Gina McKee
                            James Gandolfini


BBFC:  15                 MPAA: Not Rated
BUDGET: £612k       
BOX OFFICE: $3.5m (UK) $2.4m (US) $7.8m (worldwide)


CRITICAL KUDOS
ROTTING TOMATOES: 94%                     IDMb: 7.5/10

REVIEWS (from wiki)

A full list of reviews listed on IDMb here.

TRAILERS:

...

SYNPNOSIS:

...


SHOT 1

Medium longshot, immediate exposition of the protagonist, no narrative enigma (very brief the snow blocks some of her). Very little information is withheld, she's English, she's RP/middle-class connotations, she's a spinster. Sexuality not known yet, could be that she prefers women but highly unlikely. In background too couples. This creates a binary opposition, forever single/happy together. The whole plot of the film is to get her married to "Mr Right", and in the context of the whole. 

SHOT 2

Disolving transition into an extreme longshot of the snowy landscape a





SHOT 3

Panning shot to reveal cottage-like home. To signify her feeling of discomfort, dreaded anticipation of returning home?



SHOT 4

A woman is answering the door. This is counter-hegemonic in terms of patriarchic. However they seem to soon break the Bechdel Test by talking about a man.




SHOT 5

This is both a high and a dutch (also known as canted) angle, we still see no father or other male figure near the door, can be read as non-normative and counter hegemonic. Wealth is signified, along with the RP-accent this anchors a middle class family.